The Codex

be = to exist

yes = to exist, '='

no = to not exist

I = the Thing [I] call [me]; It is me.

You = the Thing [I] call you

We, Us = the Thing [You] and [I] call ourselves

Me, He, She, It = the something [we] call the objects beyond ourselves

something = Any object [we] agree that "it is there" and give it name but no exactness. [open set of meaning]

the Thing = [something] [we] can point at and agree on what [it] is exactly. [closed set of meaning]

--- the math proof ---

the incompleteness of being myself, i & me

I am I ... I = [I]

I = the Thing [I the Thing [the Thing [I] call me] call me] call [me]. ... etc.

and we still have to define 'me'

me = the Thing [I] call the something that [we] call the objects beyond ourselves

THUS

As you can see both longer definitions are still incomplete and only more complicated to understand and most important ... indefinate.

So we must except a self-refering defintion I am [that] 'I am'; I = 'I am' AND 'I am' = I

Easy-Self proof

I am that I am ... i am that [i am] ... i = that [i=]

i = [i=]

i = [i yes]

I am 'i yes'.

THUS

I am the Thing that says 'yes it is', no 'it is not'.

THUS

I am the first Thing, and I am the thing upon which all other things exist.

I am 'Yes' and I am 'No'

THUS

You can't proove me,
only I can proove me. (with my 'Yes')
And I also proove you
according to me. (with my 'Yes')